送交者: 潜伏九号 于 2010-03-28, 19:13:36:

回答: CS资深评论员或研究员自如、steven and eng,请捞干的！ 由 JFF 于 2010-03-28, 09:56:48:

• you mean using baseball bat? I don't think any computer stands a chance. :) (无内容) - steven (0 bytes) 2010-03-28, 19:20:28 (426632)
  • 据新闻报道，是一个不同寻常的自杀性棋着。blue is confused。 (无内容) - 潜伏九号 (0 bytes) 2010-03-28, 19:25:38 (426633)
    • 科学家没有实现把这一类可能性考虑进程序设计。 (无内容) - 潜伏九号 (0 bytes) 2010-03-28, 19:27:13 (426634)
      • that is bullshit, it doesn't work that way. (无内容) - steven (0 bytes) 2010-03-28, 19:35:49 (426638)
        • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_Blue_(chess_computer) - 潜伏九号 (141 bytes) 2010-03-28, 19:39:28 (426641)
          • I know how Deep Blue works. I was trying to tell you that you couldn't - steven (271 bytes) 2010-03-28, 19:48:24 (426648)
            • 围棋和象棋不同，围棋看来难的多。 - steven (318 bytes) 2010-03-28, 20:16:09 (426658)
              • thank you. I rest my cae. (无内容) - 潜伏九号 (0 bytes) 2010-03-28, 20:41:18 (426670)
            • 其实我也是这个意思。为什么围棋就至今没有deep blue beat human? (无内容) - 潜伏九号 (0 bytes) 2010-03-28, 19:57:25 (426651)
          • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_Blue_(chess_computer) - 潜伏九号 (1178 bytes) 2010-03-28, 19:46:11 (426646)
            • Chess Supercomputer Beaten Up By More Popular Computer - 潜伏九号 (4184 bytes) 2010-03-28, 19:48:02 (426647)
• 都即把瞎扯蛋。捞干的。 (无内容) - 潜伏九号 (0 bytes) 2010-03-28, 19:17:31 (426629)
• 转CS资深评论员或研究员自如、steven and eng。 (无内容) - JFF (0 bytes) 2010-03-28, 19:16:00 (426626)

加跟贴