Those 2 are the dictionary's definitions, not mine.

Those 2 are the dictionary's definitions, not mine.

所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛

送交者: outsider 于 2010-05-12, 18:50:03:

回答: 这样问是没有意义的由 eng 于 2010-05-12, 18:44:55:

If you think that the answer from the author himself is not as accurate as your understanding, them I have nothing to say.

而且你用的是二选一的形式，被选的义项不能认为是作者的真正意思。 (无内容) - eng (0 bytes) 2010-05-12, 19:58:21 (440897)
- He had a choice say both 1 and 2 and he chose to say 1. (无内容) - outsider (0 bytes) 2010-05-12, 20:09:04 (440900)
  - 一样，你相当于只给了三个选项，他只能选最接近的那个，不代表他就完全认同那个意思 (无内容) - eng (0 bytes) 2010-05-12, 20:29:46 (440904)
我没说是你自己的定义，只是说你不能通过这样的方法来理解integrity of science - eng (178 bytes) 2010-05-12, 19:56:03 (440896)
- He already stated clearly what he meant by integrity. - outsider (12 bytes) 2010-05-12, 20:08:00 (440899)
  - 他只说integrity在这里可以用这条义项来解释 - eng (93 bytes) 2010-05-12, 20:33:25 (440907)
    - I have nothing to say. Sigh. (无内容) - outsider (0 bytes) 2010-05-12, 21:34:33 (440939)