you need to know a lot more in this topi,


所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛

送交者: steven 于 2010-02-01, 14:27:56:

回答: 这个问题不是科学问题,而是逻辑学语言学问题 由 阮宗光 于 2010-02-01, 13:39:56:

especially about Godel's incompleteness theorem. Science as we know it is no more than a set of sentences, a finite subset of it called axioms based on observable facts, and the rest of sentences are deducted from the axioms applying inference rules. This system is incomplete, end of the story. Please look into the paper "Undecidability and Intractability in Theoretical Physics (1985)" and see whether 科学用的着 or not.



所有跟贴:


加跟贴

笔名: 密码: 注册笔名请按这里

标题:

内容: (BBCode使用说明