考虑一个人坐在椅子上时对于地心的关系。用一维时间一维空间，以相对于水平线的每一个角度为一个时间坐标值，以这个人对地心的距离为其空间坐标值。当时间前行而空间坐标值不变时，他的时空位置变了。这个变化对于时间的二阶导数指向地心，引起重力的感觉。

https://users.cs.jmu.edu/bernstdh/web/common/lectures/images/polar-coordinates_discretization.gif

http://joeflip4.files.wordpress.com/2008/07/circular_motion.jpg

Is it not possible for me to regard the earth as free from rotation, if I conceive of the centrifugal force, which acts on all bodies at rest relatively to the earth, as being a "real" field of gravitation, or part of such a field? If this idea can be carried out, then we shall have proved in very truth the identity of gravitation and inertia. For the same property which is regarded as inertia from the point of view of a system not taking part in the rotation can be interpreted as gravitation when considered with respect to a system that shares the rotation. According to Newton, this interpretation is impossible, because by Newton's law the centrifugal field cannot be regarded as being produced by matter, and because in Newton's theory there is no place for a "real" field of the "Koriolis-field" type. But perhaps Newton's law of field could be replaced by another that fits in with the field which holds with respect to a "rotating" system of co-ordinates? My conviction of the identity of inertial and gravitational mass aroused within me the feeling of absolute confidence in the correctness of this interpretation.