第5修正案是这样说double jeopardy法则


所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛

送交者: HHS 于 2010-09-17, 13:06:05:

回答: 昏昏, 象这种案子在美国是不是发现再多证据也不可重审--一罪不二审 由 zqliu 于 2010-09-17, 12:57:03:

但有个漏洞,着是指同一管辖区。如果有不同的管辖区重迭(犯的罪既违反州法律也违反了联邦法律),两个都可以把
被告单独审一遍。

Amendment V

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.




所有跟贴:


加跟贴

笔名: 密码: 注册笔名请按这里

标题:

内容: (BBCode使用说明