He was wrong either way



所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛http://www.xys.org/cgi-bin/mainpage.pl

送交者: aliastwo 于 2005-4-08, 12:01:42:

回答: (if A then B) -/-> (if !A then !B); but... 由 Dominatus 于 2005-4-08, 11:37:57:

Apparently A则B means (if A then B), here comes the question how you translate A即B.

if A即B means (if B then A), then 合理->存在。but he stated in his first posting, 不合理->不存在,so Enlighten was right in the first place.

if A即B means (if A then B), then 存在->合理 or 不合理>不存在。Well, all he said later,like 我因此告诉你“不存在说明它不合理”,were just bullshit!



所有跟贴:


加跟贴

笔名: 密码(可选项): 注册笔名请按这里

标题:

内容(可选项):

URL(可选项):
URL标题(可选项):
图像(可选项):


所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛http://www.xys.org/cgi-bin/mainpage.pl