Gates vs. Jobs

送交者: eddie 于 2011-10-06, 13:08:27:

引用：

"A hundred years from now, when people talk about Bill Gates and Steve Jobs, Gates is going to be remembered for his philanthropy, not technology," said tech forecaster Paul Saffo," the same way people remember Andrew Carnegie for the money he gave to education, not the fortune he made in steel. But what they're going to say about Steve Jobs is that he led a revolution."

所有跟贴:

盖茨的贡献比乔布斯大多了 - 2012 (158 bytes) 2011-10-06, 16:04:29 (622757)
- 微软是运气,苹果是创新. - qiansuiyuan (413 bytes) 2011-10-06, 18:35:37 (622780)
  - 运气? 中彩票是才运气，但是中彩票都中不了那么多钱。 (无内容) - 008 (0 bytes) 2011-10-06, 20:15:59 (622795)
  - you had the details wrong a bit. - steven (645 bytes) 2011-10-06, 18:54:59 (622783)
    - It is "YES" (野史) :) - qiansuiyuan (76 bytes) 2011-10-06, 19:08:31 (622784)
- actually, you were wrong. Gates wasn't the first. - steven (169 bytes) 2011-10-06, 18:17:27 (622778)
- 这两位没有可比性，专攻不同，不可同日而语。 (无内容) - 蓝隼 (0 bytes) 2011-10-06, 16:21:08 (622764)
微软的贡献岂是苹果能比，没了苹果生活缺了些酷的应用，没了微软世界马上瘫掉 (无内容) - oztiger (0 bytes) 2011-10-06, 15:51:22 (622751)
- 不能这么说，苹果就是在低谷的时候，在基础科学研究和大型工程管理 - 蓝隼 (100 bytes) 2011-10-06, 16:03:04 (622756)
  - 展开说说？基础科学研究和大型工程管理没有微软/苹果都无所谓 - 2012 (25 bytes) 2011-10-06, 16:06:23 (622758)
    - 我说的基础研究不只是计算机的基础研究。 - 蓝隼 (253 bytes) 2011-10-06, 16:17:01 (622762)
      - 不管IBM,MS,还是Apple在信息革命的角度都无法超越Google的贡献 (无内容) - conner (0 bytes) 2011-10-06, 17:57:02 (622776)
这就好象说造ferrari的比造toyota的更revolutionary (无内容) - 008 (0 bytes) 2011-10-06, 15:13:32 (622741)
- I wouldn't say that. If you really know computer, you won't say that either. (无内容) - steven (0 bytes) 2011-10-06, 19:12:06 (622785)
Jobs 比Gates 更突出的地方是: - qiansuiyuan (91 bytes) 2011-10-06, 14:32:56 (622730)
Jobs 应该多跑步锻炼身体。 (无内容) - conner (0 bytes) 2011-10-06, 14:25:24 (622726)
Both gates and jobs are amazing and influential figure to our age. (无内容) - shine (0 bytes) 2011-10-06, 13:34:17 (622720)

加跟贴