送交者: skipper3 于 2005-6-10, 13:32:18:

回答: no, they only proprietary component IBM used was the BIOS, 由 steven 于 2005-6-10, 13:12:35:

My understanding is it is not much more than one of many ways to implement a digital logic. These days CPU makers choose to use this architecture is mostly because of market acceptance not because it is techonologically superior am I right? So the value of the license is in the market participators (who would incur prohibitive cost if they choose not to follow) not the inventor. Why should the MIPS continue to receive the benefit?

• it is because the cheap licensing fee. - steven (0 bytes) 2005-6-10, 15:26:51
  • here is the real deal. - steven (1324 bytes) 2005-6-10, 15:51:52
    • from strategic point of view, what you said is - skipper3 (187 bytes) 2005-6-10, 16:45:21
      • as a defensive action, D-II is futile. It is easier to take intel plants - steven (17 bytes) 2005-6-10, 20:05:05
        • 对啊，但是没人没技术工厂自动回变出片片来？再说也没听说过拿工厂当人质的。 - skipper3 (0 bytes) 2005-6-10, 22:32:13
          • that's a sarcastic joke. For one, D-II development is definitly not - steven (343 bytes) 2005-6-11, 00:40:26
    • Don't know how much was invested in the project. - skipper3 (442 bytes) 2005-6-10, 16:30:23

加跟贴