送交者: Latino2 于 2005-10-28, 10:16:06:

喜欢吃老印的馕的人看来还不少。终于和昏昏有了一个共同的观点，来之不易, 得八卦一把。

老印的馕比老中的烙饼好吃，主要是因为老印的小麦加工品质(烘烤品质, to be specific)普遍比老中的小麦好。 老印的小麦面筋含量高，质量好。 面筋的质量直接影响烘烤制品的各种指标，吸水率， 延展性， 拉伸面积等各项指标。反映到饼上，就成了”松软“，”有弹性“, “筋道” 等...... 比如，老印的面粉吸水率在65%-70%，而老中小麦面粉吸水率一般不到60%。

国内也有优质小麦， 比如陕西， 河南， 山西的一些小麦品种。但总的来说优质小麦还是靠进口。现在国内的屁查店都用进口面粉。

国内的小麦质量差并不是老中研究不出来，而是政策上长期抓高产，忽视了品质。没有市场的价格支持， 优质小麦买不出高价钱，所以以前长期没人研究。瓜菜代的时候闹下的后遗症。 现在国家拿出了不少钱搞优质小麦。

第二个原因，老印的馕合面时加了很多酸奶， 烘烤以后特香，也是一重要原因。

上星期又去吃了老印的馕，吃到后来才发现馕上面嵌着两根头发。

老板于是又饶了俺一个腐瑞, 打包回家。

• No No No, it is the butter! - meiyou (0 bytes) 2005-10-28, 12:24:16
  • Ha, makes better sense. I forgot the butter factor! - Latino2 (0 bytes) 2005-10-28, 13:18:26
• I tasted authentic Naan and Roti in India, Roti tasted better. - PhonyDoctorPhD (73 bytes) 2005-10-28, 11:59:26
  • Rodi in India is more spicy and tasty. - Latino2 (0 bytes) 2005-10-28, 13:20:56
    • There is also none spicy, plain Roti that is very good - PhonyDoctorPhD (75 bytes) 2005-10-28, 15:47:33
• Congratulations! - 匆匆过客 (431 bytes) 2005-10-28, 11:53:42
  • Let me guess: you must be a vegetarian? :) - Latino2 (250 bytes) 2005-10-28, 12:09:28
    • NO WAY! - 匆匆过客 (277 bytes) 2005-10-28, 12:28:42
      • The joke says: Restaurants "Beef Up" Vegetarian Menus - Latino2 (95 bytes) 2005-10-28, 14:27:48
        • 北人中知道扬州人叫扬州狮子头为斩肉的恐怕不多 - 匆匆过客 (185 bytes) 2005-10-28, 15:26:10
          • 「炒白菜」还是「炒肉片」的哲学思辩 - HunHunSheng (8080 bytes) 2005-10-28, 15:44:27
          • 恕俺冒昧。 - Latino2 (112 bytes) 2005-10-28, 15:37:00
            • Makes sense, I guess. - 匆匆过客 (388 bytes) 2005-10-28, 16:07:35
• 我更喜欢印度人做的Roti Prata - eng (24 bytes) 2005-10-28, 11:32:37
  • I like Roti too, but many QingRen compatriats hate curry. - Latino2 (60 bytes) 2005-10-28, 11:53:52
• 真奇怪。。。 - Enlighten (101 bytes) 2005-10-28, 10:30:47
  • fagus has a term: 好饼 - Neither Jin Yong nor February River is a 好饼 - HunHunSheng (0 bytes) 2005-10-28, 10:37:11
    • Is February River a LaoDaZi? - Latino2 (30 bytes) 2005-10-28, 12:19:59
      • 二月河，汉族， - HunHunSheng (721 bytes) 2005-10-28, 12:41:32
        • It's full of bias when a QingRen writes the history of LaoDaZi. - Latino2 (0 bytes) 2005-10-28, 13:09:10
          • If a Qinren lives in Tartar territories, this person is a Tartar. - steven (235 bytes) 2005-10-28, 13:57:04
            • Yeah, he was "converted". - Latino2 (0 bytes) 2005-10-28, 14:07:23
• 面筋基本上是蛋白质吧？ - Enlighten (50 bytes) 2005-10-28, 10:26:07
  • 不用小时候， - qtl (206 bytes) 2005-10-28, 10:37:42
  • That's correct. - Latino2 (0 bytes) 2005-10-28, 10:32:26
• 老美有没有离婚避免结婚惩罚税的？ - 无知 (0 bytes) 2005-10-28, 10:23:54
  • Tax codes favor married people - HunHunSheng (0 bytes) 2005-10-28, 10:25:50
    • never heard of "marriage penalty"? - 无知 (0 bytes) 2005-10-28, 10:27:56
      • There is a penalty. But I think the amount is only about $300. - Enlighten (0 bytes) 2005-10-28, 10:32:18
      • Nope. and married couple can still file seperately - HunHunSheng (0 bytes) 2005-10-28, 10:31:10
        • yeah, but it's 'married file seperately', not 'unmarried, different. - 无知 (0 bytes) 2005-10-28, 10:37:21
          • The standard deduction is the same for married filing seperately and single - HunHunSheng (0 bytes) 2005-10-28, 10:53:09
            • and tax rate is only very slightly higher - HunHunSheng (87 bytes) 2005-10-28, 11:03:55
              • See, that's the penalty WuZhi was talking about. - Enlighten (0 bytes) 2005-10-28, 11:07:02
                • But the rate for married filing jointly is much lower - HunHunSheng (47 bytes) 2005-10-28, 11:11:40
                  • No, it favor married people with one income. - wangle (99 bytes) 2005-10-28, 12:58:10
                    • Then choose to file married filing seperately - HunHunSheng (0 bytes) 2005-10-28, 13:00:13
                      • then you paid couple K more than if not married and file seperately. - 无知 (0 bytes) 2005-10-28, 14:33:16
                  • 够买一车四川榨菜的。 - 无知 (0 bytes) 2005-10-28, 12:17:46
        • Usually it's the same amount of total tax whether jointly or separately. - Enlighten (0 bytes) 2005-10-28, 10:33:25
• You used another type of fallacies here (I need to look up to give a name) - HunHunSheng (366 bytes) 2005-10-28, 10:23:18
  • I am referring Bing in China and Bing in India. - Latino2 (59 bytes) 2005-10-28, 10:31:24

加跟贴