送交者: OldMountains 于 2010-02-26, 08:57:18:

回答: 我肉眼凡胎，“这是枝节，退一万步说，就算这个枝节我全错”？ 由 潜伏九号 于 2010-02-26, 00:30:36:

• 这第一棒关键在于用铁的事实不容争辩地证明：OldMountains的言论毫无credential！ - JFF (1388 bytes) 2010-02-26, 09:53:11 (418115)
  • 呵呵，你可以无限东拉西扯胡搅蛮缠下去。 (无内容) - OldMountains (0 bytes) 2010-02-26, 10:47:06 (418149)
• I am not saying who is right or wrong, just - 潜伏九号 (78 bytes) 2010-02-26, 09:31:26 (418102)
  • No! All I was saying is, that trivial dosen't matter! Think of the real point! - OldMountains (213 bytes) 2010-02-26, 09:40:30 (418107)
    • The basic argument is whether poem should be constrained by formality, - 潜伏九号 (343 bytes) 2010-02-26, 09:58:21 (418118)
      • Your understanding is not correct. - OldMountains (961 bytes) 2010-02-26, 10:38:56 (418143)
        • 没意象的诗有，但很少。新诗废除格律，说明那个形式元素对诗歌不是必要。 (无内容) - BigMac (0 bytes) 2010-02-26, 10:58:43 (418152)
        • 说的不错 - fuzzify (76 bytes) 2010-02-26, 10:47:48 (418150)
          • 在一定程度上我也乐在其中。杀屎棋轻松轻松。他经常弱智得出彩！ - OldMountains (54 bytes) 2010-02-26, 11:17:45 (418157)

加跟贴