perhaps, 钱学森's 亩产万斤 really has nothing to do with



所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛http://www.xys.org/cgi-bin/mainpage.pl

送交者: steven 于 2005-3-24, 14:23:02:

回答: 新到中关于钱学长的评价 由 conner 于 2005-3-24, 12:19:45:

bad science. I didn't read the origianl "official" scientific paper. As I record, those opinions were quote from newspaper. Disregard the polictical enviornment at that time, Qian's opinions might be a product of casual talks with reporters. He might not have been very careful about his words, or even his calculation. Those opinions were definitly not a serious work intented to submit for peer review. I don't think we should be to serious about it. After all, everyone, practically, knows those opinions are wrong.




所有跟贴:


加跟贴

笔名: 密码(可选项): 注册笔名请按这里

标题:

内容(可选项):

URL(可选项):
URL标题(可选项):
图像(可选项):


所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛http://www.xys.org/cgi-bin/mainpage.pl