送交者: whoami 于 2015-10-25, 15:32:57:
回答: 你这个文献是正常的讨论,和方舟子不在一个层面上。 由 OldMountains3 于 2015-10-25, 14:45:46:
who不会去评价某个具体工作。
德国组的工作十年来好像没有实质的进展或支持他们claim的工作。
这里有一篇老鼠实验的,可以说是不支持德国人的:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014489409001003
OF1 mice infected with Plasmodium chabaudi chabaudi were treated for upto 6 days by administration of: water (control group), A. annua infusion (tea group), 0.022 mg AR (AR-equiv. group) and 0.8 mg AR on the first day and 0.4 mg the following day (AR-WHO group).
Initially, the parasitaemia increased in all groups. On day 4 it reached 75% in the control group, 72% in the AR-equiv. group, 50% in the tea group and 3% in the AR-WHO group. Mice treated with A. annua tea died after 11 days, while 83% of AR-WHO dose survived.
The tea does not decrease the parasitaemia fast enough. We suggest that large clinical trials on human subjects are necessary to ascertain the efficacy of standardized tea. Additionally, other treatment possibilities are suggested