送交者: skipper3 于 2005-1-30, 16:43:22:

回答: He gave his explaination, certainly not a perfect one. 由 Latino2 于 2005-1-30, 16:26:48:

well becasue there is not enough information to allow a flawless logical thinking.

I did read from somewhere before that, because the flood in yellow river region was very severe in ancient China, the amount of agriculture production sufficient enough to support the population could only be made possible by collective effort and centralized coordination. That may explain the spirit of individualism was never given a chance to take root.

• Question for skipper3 : 文科 vs. 理科 - Enlighten (367 bytes) 2005-1-30, 18:10:06
  • resoning alone means nothing to me. Whther it is - skipper3 (1049 bytes) 2005-1-30, 18:27:26
    • Different things - Enlighten (782 bytes) 2005-1-30, 18:58:57
      • Social science is not science. - skipper3 (350 bytes) 2005-1-30, 19:11:17
        • Scientists don't always agree with one another and they aren't alway right - Enlighten (62 bytes) 2005-1-30, 19:15:38
          • then everyone is using scientific methodology. - skipper3 (193 bytes) 2005-1-30, 19:24:05
            • It is probably because "it's not scientific at all" - Enlighten (226 bytes) 2005-1-30, 19:45:40
              • too many examples. give you one. - skipper3 (278 bytes) 2005-1-30, 19:55:12
                • first one is not enough, second I'm not sure it applies - Enlighten (396 bytes) 2005-1-30, 20:03:38
                  • what's point? - skipper3 (377 bytes) 2005-1-30, 20:21:18
                    • I agree it's BS. But the BS started when you said this - Enlighten (201 bytes) 2005-1-30, 20:31:54
    • for individual making a decision, you do the SuanZhang, - skipper3 (597 bytes) 2005-1-30, 18:45:15
      • Your assertion cannot be farther from the truth - Enlighten (524 bytes) 2005-1-30, 19:08:34
        • whatever you call statistics. The fact is people - skipper3 (184 bytes) 2005-1-30, 19:20:19
          • Science has reached there long ago - Enlighten (362 bytes) 2005-1-30, 19:29:08
            • Pleeeeez! You are frustrating me. - skipper3 (320 bytes) 2005-1-30, 19:34:56
              • You are changing the topic - Enlighten (450 bytes) 2005-1-30, 19:52:47
                • don't jump the gun. - skipper3 (567 bytes) 2005-1-30, 20:07:08
                  • Well, you oversimplified 理科 and attacked 理科人士 unfairly - Enlighten (651 bytes) 2005-1-30, 20:27:43
• What you said was along the same line. - Latino2 (266 bytes) 2005-1-30, 17:02:42
  • Diamond 的解释的要害是事后解释，偶可从中国和欧洲的历史来反驳 - xj (327 bytes) 2005-1-30, 17:43:49
    • 环境是个制约因素，人和社会本身才是社会发展的主要动力 - xj (842 bytes) 2005-1-30, 23:32:38
      • 全是瞎说. - fagus (378 bytes) 2005-1-31, 03:31:03
        • 小法你再这样眼光狭隘不讲道理，偶要学HUNHUN抵制你了 - xj (227 bytes) 2005-1-31, 13:15:34

加跟贴