主流医学界似乎并不认可这种所谓传统制药法的有效性


所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛

送交者: whoami 于 2015-10-25, 14:06:43:

回答: 转贴:青蒿素,请给科学以真实——浸泡与渍绞之辨 由 OldMountains3 于 2015-10-25, 00:49:46:

世界卫生组织12年的position仍然是
“ WHO does notrecommend the use A. annua plant
material ,in any form, including tea, for the treatment
or、the prevention of malaria”

http://www.who.int/malaria/diagnosis_treatment/position_statement_herbal_remedy_artemisia_annua_l.pdf?ua=1


下面这篇13年综述可以看出,西医和所谓的“holistic approach of traditional medicinal systems”
两个阵营立场分明观点相反。该文作者单位是澳洲一个大学的补充
医学研究中心,应当不是西医阵营的,他也只能得出结论说
“This review reports that there are still too many gaps in our existing knowledge to provide conclusive evidence for either of the two sides of the argument.”




所有跟贴:


加跟贴

笔名: 密码: 注册笔名请按这里

标题:

内容: (BBCode使用说明